Go Back   Male vs Female | The Mixed Wrestling Forum > Mixed Wrestling & Fighting > Wrestling & Fighting Discussion



Check out the latest release by Fight Pulse: Bianca vs Andreas.
Preview photos are available in this topic. Get this video at: Fight Pulse - MX-251.




Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 13-Apr-19, 23:39
Johnny Nobody's Avatar
Johnny Nobody Johnny Nobody is offline
Member
Points: 6,983, Level: 35 Points: 6,983, Level: 35 Points: 6,983, Level: 35
Activity: 7.1% Activity: 7.1% Activity: 7.1%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Gender: Male
Location: Midwest US
Posts: 360
Thanks: 73
Thanked 678 Times in 212 Posts
Default Re: Negative session reviews on SG dilemma

If SG and WB won't allow negative reviews, I guess we have to come here for the straight dope.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Johnny Nobody For This Useful Post:
  #52  
Old 15-Apr-19, 22:41
Braddogg4345's Avatar
Braddogg4345 Braddogg4345 is offline
Member
Points: 16,299, Level: 55 Points: 16,299, Level: 55 Points: 16,299, Level: 55
Activity: 2.4% Activity: 2.4% Activity: 2.4%
Last Achievements
Award-Showcase
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Gender: Male
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,093
Thanks: 412
Thanked 2,023 Times in 615 Posts
Default Re: Sydney Thunder reviews

Quote:
Originally Posted by georgejohnson [Only Registered Users Can See LinksClick Here To Register]
I left a negative review for a "Mistress Nadia" of San Diego which was removed. I actually made the mistake of sending my photo ID (with pertinent info blotted out, but still) at which point she dropped off the earth. This was two days before the session. For a woman looking like that to have 2-3 half-hearted reviews in 3 months was a red flag. I saw later where s/he posted a positive review of herself. I say s/he because that profile is very likely a fake. At least she didn't ask for a deposit, so I lost the time but not money.
Funny you should mention “mistress nadia”. I actually contacted SG about “her”. Because none of her links work, she doesn’t have a profile on Wb270 (which her profile claims), and she only had the one half-assed review. I also tried googling additional photos of her, and the only ones that came up, were the same ones posted to SG.

SG replied saying that as far as they could tell, it was a real profile. You should contact them if you havent already.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cubs_fan [Only Registered Users Can See LinksClick Here To Register]
You guys keep missing the problem of allowing negative reviews on SG and WB. Neither person who runs those sites has the time or desire to be the session police because they are running FREE services. Where are they supposed to find the time to properly vet and investigate these negative reviews for accuracy? In Jen's case in costs her money to run SG.

If you think this is a feature that should be allowed then I'd start ponying some money up first to compensate each for their time in having to be the session police.
I actually said to keep the negative reviews. Unless they are completely inappropriate. And in that case, the girl can submit the inappropriate review to the SG site, so that SG can determine if it should be pulled. And when i say inappropriate, i dont mean all bad. I mean malicious or false.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 16-Apr-19, 00:47
georgejohnson's Avatar
georgejohnson georgejohnson is offline
Member
Points: 23,379, Level: 66 Points: 23,379, Level: 66 Points: 23,379, Level: 66
Activity: 6.3% Activity: 6.3% Activity: 6.3%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Gender: Male
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 666
Thanks: 595
Thanked 1,877 Times in 368 Posts
Default Re: Sydney Thunder reviews

Quote:
Originally Posted by Braddogg4345 [Only Registered Users Can See LinksClick Here To Register]
Funny you should mention “mistress nadia”. I actually contacted SG about “her”. Because none of her links work, she doesn’t have a profile on Wb270 (which her profile claims), and she only had the one half-assed review. I also tried googling additional photos of her, and the only ones that came up, were the same ones posted to SG.
It gets better. S/he put up a positive self-review using Nadia's name. Somebody caught it and responded "Did you really put up your own review?" If you google the phone number it points to ads on escort sites. Not certain what kind of scam it is. I'm sure that if she was really doing sessions she'd have a bunch of real reviews based on her photos.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 16-Apr-19, 14:32
boyofwinter boyofwinter is offline
Member
Points: 26,283, Level: 70 Points: 26,283, Level: 70 Points: 26,283, Level: 70
Activity: 99.3% Activity: 99.3% Activity: 99.3%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,936
Thanks: 2,728
Thanked 3,335 Times in 1,828 Posts
Default Re: Sydney Thunder reviews

Quote:
Originally Posted by Braddogg4345 [Only Registered Users Can See LinksClick Here To Register]
I actually contacted SG about “her”. Because none of her links work, she doesn’t have a profile on Wb270 (which her profile claims), and she only had the one half-assed review.
[Only Registered Users Can See LinksClick Here To Register]
I've found a few of the wb270 links on sg don't work, they must need to enter the link differently on the form than seems obvious.
ALl that being said, a wb270 link doesn't mean anyone should send a large deposit etc.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to boyofwinter For This Useful Post:
  #55  
Old 17-Apr-19, 03:35
uxiel uxiel is offline
Member
Points: 11,051, Level: 45 Points: 11,051, Level: 45 Points: 11,051, Level: 45
Activity: 21.4% Activity: 21.4% Activity: 21.4%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 1,925
Thanks: 1,060
Thanked 2,162 Times in 1,030 Posts
Default Re: Negative session reviews on SG dilemma

She never asked me for a deposit. I don't think it's a fake profile, I just think she's unreliable and has the attention span of a 12-year-old. She's in her 30s. You can hope for the 0.01% chance she shows up, remembers what kind of session you want, respects your boundaries, or you can schedule with someone who knows what she's doing.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to uxiel For This Useful Post:
  #56  
Old 08-Jan-20, 17:43
Johnny Nobody's Avatar
Johnny Nobody Johnny Nobody is offline
Member
Points: 6,983, Level: 35 Points: 6,983, Level: 35 Points: 6,983, Level: 35
Activity: 7.1% Activity: 7.1% Activity: 7.1%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Gender: Male
Location: Midwest US
Posts: 360
Thanks: 73
Thanked 678 Times in 212 Posts
Default Re: Negative session reviews on SG dilemma

So I recently posted all of my reviews from here on SG. All of them passed review and were posted except one, my review of my session with Chloe.

My reviews have all been positive, including the one of my session with Chloe. The only difference is, I beat Chloe and make this clear in my review. So is this why my Chloe review wasn't posted? Do they not want ruin the illusion of Chloe (and all the other girls) being unstoppable, unbeatable goddesses?

It is the only thing I can think of as to why it wasn't posted. I thought this was interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 11-Jan-20, 13:22
jfm jfm is offline
Member
Points: 5,265, Level: 30 Points: 5,265, Level: 30 Points: 5,265, Level: 30
Activity: 7.1% Activity: 7.1% Activity: 7.1%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Gender: Male
Location: VA
Posts: 399
Thanks: 428
Thanked 442 Times in 230 Posts
Default Re: Negative session reviews on SG dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Nobody [Only Registered Users Can See LinksClick Here To Register]
So I recently posted all of my reviews from here on SG. All of them passed review and were posted except one, my review of my session with Chloe.....

It is the only thing I can think of as to why it wasn't posted. I thought this was interesting.
Or maybe the webmaster forgot to click the save button. People make mistakes. After reading the reviews posted on SG, I doubt much is done in the way of screening.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jfm For This Useful Post:
  #58  
Old 11-Jan-20, 19:08
Jennifer's Avatar
Jennifer Jennifer is offline
Producer
Points: 30,392, Level: 76 Points: 30,392, Level: 76 Points: 30,392, Level: 76
Activity: 7.1% Activity: 7.1% Activity: 7.1%
Last Achievements
Award-Showcase
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Gender: Female
Location: Venice California
Posts: 771
Thanks: 790
Thanked 3,211 Times in 581 Posts
Default Re: Negative session reviews on SG dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zweig [Only Registered Users Can See LinksClick Here To Register]
@[Only Registered Users Can See LinksClick Here To Register], let's launch a crowdfunding campaign to help you with the costs of upgrading / editing the site. I think it would help if we created a thread (or renamed this one - [Only Registered Users Can See LinksClick Here To Register]) to see what people would like to see changed / added.

That would be AMAZING!!! I think it would be great
To have moreso a “team” that can fine tune SessionGirls
Into something that would benefit everyone who uses the site .
I appreciate it ! Thank you Zweig !

Added after 5 minutes:

As for reviews.. girls are now able to defend themselves and respond back to a
Negative review .

Here are a couple examples of when reviews are not posted or removed:

- Reviews that complain about not responding or are very insulting/malicious

- One guy will write multiple bad reviews on different girls at same time ..

- Review makes mention or suggests any sexual activity

- Girl contacts me and tell me her side of the story

Also .. extra note ; my web guy who I unfortunately am forced to stay with ( long story )
Makes a lot of decisions without telling me . He likes to interact with
The girls thru emails and has sessions with them .. so I’m not the only one running
Things as much I would like to be . ��
__________________
[Only Registered Users Can See LinksClick Here To Register]

Last edited by Jennifer; 11-Jan-20 at 19:28.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jennifer For This Useful Post:
  #59  
Old 11-Jan-20, 20:27
Brakfool Brakfool is offline
Member
Points: 7,779, Level: 37 Points: 7,779, Level: 37 Points: 7,779, Level: 37
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 199
Thanks: 37
Thanked 443 Times in 122 Posts
Default Re: Negative session reviews on SG dilemma

let me say this, Yelp, Amazon, etc get negative reviews all the time, does it mean that the particular product or service is bad, NO. But editing out negative reviews doesn't make the site honest in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 11-Jan-20, 20:52
KillerCrushes's Avatar
KillerCrushes KillerCrushes is offline
Producer
Points: 27,518, Level: 72 Points: 27,518, Level: 72 Points: 27,518, Level: 72
Activity: 19.0% Activity: 19.0% Activity: 19.0%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Gender: Male
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 1,952
Thanks: 941
Thanked 2,448 Times in 1,066 Posts
Default Re: Negative session reviews on SG dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brakfool [Only Registered Users Can See LinksClick Here To Register]
let me say this, Yelp, Amazon, etc get negative reviews all the time, does it mean that the particular product or service is bad, NO. But editing out negative reviews doesn't make the site honest in my opinion.
Here is where it lands for me:

In the case of SG, providers/models (I will use these terms interchangeably) are paying to list, because they are selling a service. FAKE reviews should not be allowed, but a listing which contains only positive reviews is completely legitimate under these circumstances.

Businesses listed on Yelp are not paying to be there and Amazon is a completely different monster altogether...not germane to this conversation.

If you want what you consider to be an "honest" review site that contains the negative accounts, revealing all the warts, then it needs to be a platform like Zweig's, some other message board, or maybe a social media account on Insta or twitter, etc.
__________________
[Only Registered Users Can See LinksClick Here To Register]
[Only Registered Users Can See LinksClick Here To Register]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are there any long term negative effects to being Choked Out/KO'd in Sessions? HeadScissorFan Wrestling & Fighting Discussion 13 17-Jul-18 14:12
My session reviews Subboy2 Wrestling & Fighting Discussion 16 30-Aug-16 06:13
Internal dilemma lancerlax Wrestling & Fighting Discussion 10 24-Sep-14 20:43
Session reviews Grappler86 General Discussion [Off-Topic] 2 11-Jan-12 19:06


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:39.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.