Sarah Brooke reviews

[Acjedrummer]

That is exactly what pedantic means

[bjojo]

How sensual does Sarah get?

[mrbastard]

Originally Posted by bjojo [Only Registered Users Can See LinksClick Here To Register]

How sensual does Sarah get?

I didn't ask and she didn't either.

[Nate]

Originally Posted by bjojo [Only Registered Users Can See LinksClick Here To Register]

How sensual does Sarah get?

Not very. I sessioned with her a few times and it’s not sensual, even though that’s what I wanted

[Brakfool]

Sarah is hot, sexy and looking amazing… but her only job is to fuck you up! Which is why she is one of the best!

[glenron]

I'm thinking standards have gone down in the session world. In fact I know they have. I see it all the time on these boards what guys settle for these days and call awesome or great. It's not.

Sarah is a pretty good wrestler. But not elite. I saw somebody say she's just as good or better than veve or electra. Uhhh No. Sarah is not even top five of The girls I've seen as far as skills and ability. As far as strength it's similar. Yes she's strong enough, decent. But again not top 5 or prbly even top 10 for me in the strength category either. I mean she's pretty good overall, and she can get rough. But that doesn't put her in an elite category. Not even great category imo.

Same thing as far as her looks go. She's decent. With an okay body. But she's put on a few pounds and not as fit as she used to be. And as far as looks go she's not a knockout or perfect 10 by any stretch. Sorry if that's somewhat blunt or harsh, but it's accurate and honest. And I feel like a number of guys are on here inflating things well beyond accurate and honest when it comes to some of these girls. So I had to speak up.

[MLB93]

Not sure why you're including an apology if your point was to balance things out from what you felt was becoming hyperbole.

That's a choice you made and good on you without burying Sarah or anyone else that likes her.

Originally Posted by glenron [Only Registered Users Can See LinksClick Here To Register]

I'm thinking standards have gone down in the session world. In fact I know they have. I see it all the time on these boards what guys settle for these days and call awesome or great. It's not.

Sarah is a pretty good wrestler. But not elite. I saw somebody say she's just as good or better than veve or electra. Uhhh No. Sarah is not even top five of The girls I've seen as far as skills and ability. As far as strength it's similar. Yes she's strong enough, decent. But again not top 5 or prbly even top 10 for me in the strength category either. I mean she's pretty good overall, and she can get rough. But that doesn't put her in an elite category. Not even great category imo.

Same thing as far as her looks go. She's decent. With an okay body. But she's put on a few pounds and not as fit as she used to be. And as far as looks go she's not a knockout or perfect 10 by any stretch. Sorry if that's somewhat blunt or harsh, but it's accurate and honest. And I feel like a number of guys are on here inflating things well beyond accurate and honest when it comes to some of these girls. So I had to speak up.

[revanyo]

Originally Posted by glenron [Only Registered Users Can See LinksClick Here To Register]

I'm thinking standards have gone down in the session world. In fact I know they have. I see it all the time on these boards what guys settle for these days and call awesome or great. It's not.

Sarah is a pretty good wrestler. But not elite. I saw somebody say she's just as good or better than veve or electra. Uhhh No. Sarah is not even top five of The girls I've seen as far as skills and ability. As far as strength it's similar. Yes she's strong enough, decent. But again not top 5 or prbly even top 10 for me in the strength category either. I mean she's pretty good overall, and she can get rough. But that doesn't put her in an elite category. Not even great category imo.

Same thing as far as her looks go. She's decent. With an okay body. But she's put on a few pounds and not as fit as she used to be. And as far as looks go she's not a knockout or perfect 10 by any stretch. Sorry if that's somewhat blunt or harsh, but it's accurate and honest. And I feel like a number of guys are on here inflating things well beyond accurate and honest when it comes to some of these girls. So I had to speak up.

I wonder why people think this? I have a theory that Sarah is better than the average guy she faces by a solid amount, however take someone like Veve or Sheena and they are better than the average guy by miles.

So perhaps Sarah being in the better than my but close makes for a more enticing session for certain people.

Who would you compare her to?

[glenron]

Those are fair points revenyo. I would agree with what you said. I feel I am an above average opponent for these girls. I do not have elite wrestling or fighting skills. I've trained some in MMA back years ago, and I have a little bit of wresting experience from Middle school. So my skills are just average. But I'm big into health and fitness and lifting, so I maintain a muscular physique and have a definite size and strength advantage over most of the women I session with. But you are correct, the elite girls are noticeably more skilled and faster than me and have basically kicked my butt on the mat.

So there is an appeal to wrestling a girl where it's going to be a closer match and I actually have a chance. Not that I do these to win at all costs or go all out to prove a tough I am. That's not really the point. But it is better than basically knowing I'm going to get my ass handed to me for the whole hour lol.

I'm trying to think of a good comparison for Sarah...

[bjojo]

Originally Posted by mrbastard [Only Registered Users Can See LinksClick Here To Register]

I didn't ask and she didn't either.

I understand that you did not ask about it, but Sarah didn't ask you?
That does not make sense.